The other day I accepted a substitute teaching assignment at a school for children with intellectual disabilities. The school offers them a very detailed and comprehensive curriculum. This particular day, I mostly taught science classes. Since I’m a “fill-in”, I don’t really have either a global or granular view of what the teacher wants. I mostly showed the kids “Sci-Show” and “Nat Geo for Kids” episodes. I actually learned a lot from watching these shows with the kids. I jotted down all the strange things I learned: for example, the 1889 eruption of Krakatoa was heard over three thousand miles away- the approximate distance from New York to California.
No matter how severe the disability, all the children exhibited a sense of self and personhood. This is the immutable core of being human. The intellectual or academic mind has nothing to do with that core.
After I showed the videos, it was time for our daily exercises. The teaching assistants asked me to select a song for the kids to dance to, and I chose Dan McLean’s lively but poignant song “American Pie”: “The quartet practiced in the park/And we sang dirges in the dark/The day the music died.”
And one of the girls, a seventh grader I think, stood up and began dancing, her feet moving like crabs, her elbows jutting this way and that and I saw she was actually doing a dance from the late Sixties. Maybe her mother or grandmother taught her? But she knew the moves cold!
Later in the day, after having watched many science reels, I sang Guru’s beautiful morning song, “Usha Bala Elo” for the class. I sang it twice. The second time, the young girl, the dancer, joined in, she sang in perfect tune and also remembered all the words, and she sang with real feeling.
I spoke to a young woman a while back who had been involved in a car accident, that left her with some brain damage. She described the experience she had while she was on the operating table- an encounter with divine Light. As she was describing the light, I saw her face change, her whole body became enveloped in light. Her voice became calm and resonant. I felt like I was listening in on Beethoven’s mind as he was composing his late quartets- I had the feeling of privileged eavesdropping. One thing she said I wrote down:
“It makes so much difference in a mentally challenged life to get a smile, not to be overlooked and laughed at. And they [people with mental “disabilities”] might have hidden inner capacities treasured by the Supreme.”
As she was speaking, I got the sense I was in the presence of an old soul, someone who has walked many thousands of miles in the inner life. I felt the same way about this young girl, who could identify with Guru’s music so deeply after hearing it just once.
I feel America is going through an identity crisis at the moment. We are trying to figure out what kind of country we want to be, and the answer isn’t clear yet. So, it’s a moment of existential self-reflection. “American Pie” with its gracious and sad lyrics, was the right song for the children and I to dance to.
I’ve noticed that a lot of us substitute teachers are quirky anarchists. Many of us wear black, dye our hair outrageous colors and wear 1980’s “hair band” t-shirts, like from “Twisted Sister” (I don’t do any of these things). We don’t fit in society, so substitute teaching is the right job. Yesterday, I was subbing for a “push-in” special education teacher in the Latin south side of the city. On my way there, I saw lots of beautiful “Che Guevara” murals on the abandoned buildings and underpasses. A “push-in” just means I help the main teacher and support the students. But all the teachers told me they didn’t need any help, so I just went to an empty classroom and watched art historians on YouTube give lectures on Caillebotte, an Impressionist artist I have recently discovered.
Gustave Caillebotte fascinates me for a lot of reasons. I love his self-portraits. I like the intensity of his eyes.

This is an interesting painting. I like the random potted plant on the left side, with the drooping leaves. I like the unidentified friend sitting on the couch behind him reading a newspaper. I like the August Renoir painting in the background. I like the haphazard easels lying around. I like how I can see each brushstroke, just because that tells me that Caillebotte considered the methods of painting as important as the end result.
Caillebotte’s face is half in shadow- maybe indicating that we can never know anyone entirely. I recall the exchange in Shakespeare’s Hamlet between Horatio and the prince:
—
Horatio: [referring to Hamlet’s recently deceased father] I saw him once, he was a goodly king.
Hamlet: He was a man- take him for all in all…
—
We have to take Caillebotte “all in all”. Caillebotte’s legs are uncrossed, his posture is a bit stiff, he’s balancing his palette colors on his right hand and painting with his left, he’s not looking at the canvas but at someone to our immediate right. Our line of sight goes straight to his strong jaw and slightly opened mouth.
Caillebotte’s studio was his “man cave”. He wasn’t strictly speaking an Impressionist- but he was one of their first collectors, and left over eighty works of Impressionist art to the French government in his will. He also supported these great artists by buying their paintings when they were in financial difficulty. The son of a wealthy businessman, he had all the time he needed to paint and also to arrange Impressionist exhibitions. His contribution to the art world was considerable. It’s interesting that in this painting, his greatest self-portrait, he backgrounds it, not with one of his own paintings, but with Renoir’s “Bal du Moulin”. He really valued his friendship with these great artists.
Caillebotte’s great painting “Paris Street; Rainy Day”, was acquired by the Art Institute of Chicago in 1964. People flocked to see it from all over the world! This painting cemented his reputation as a great painter, and Chicago as a destination city for Impressionist art. This great painting, monumental in its execution and Caillebotte’s largest painting and his masterpiece, is the front piece for the museum’s Impressionist collection. During his lifetime he was known primarily as a collector and sponsor of art. It took the museum’s acquisition and promotion of this work, as well as shows put on by museums from Texas to Paris, to solidify his reputation as a great artist in his own right.

We can see the contrast between this painting and the self-portrait immediately. The 1879 self-portrait is more impressionistic, more occupied with the effects of light, and shows the brushstrokes, whereas this 1877 street scene is more illusionistic. You want to look at this street scene because it’s beautiful and yet feels real. Also, the perspective places the viewer right in front of the gentleman and his wife; we feel we’re about to crash into his umbrella! The painting forces us to be a participant. These two paintings show us that Caillebotte was a master of both classical and impressionist painting styles.
One thing that strikes me about the couple in the foreground is that the woman is rather stylized and the man less so. The lady looks almost ethereal in her ruffly dress and bright red lips. Caillebotte lavishes a little more realistic detail on the man- the slight wrinkles in his trousers, the buttons in his vest and shirt, the mustache, his searching, alert expression. Caillebotte was something of an outlier among the Impressionists for painting primarily men. The male body was not considered a fit subject for representation in that era. But Caillebotte challenged that idea through his dignified and monumental depictions of men. I like the painting “The Floor Scrapers” especially:

Scraping and refinishing a floor is painstaking work. Caillebotte is removed full two social classes from these men, and outranks them in power and privilege, but depicts them honestly and signs his name right below them as if to indicate some possibility for friendship. This painting isn’t a pretty picture of a haystack! There are wood shavings on the floor, the men are shirtless and sweaty, we see the tools and the open wine bottle and the full glass. But the men are angular and even heroic in the hard light.
Modern critics sometimes struggle with how to classify Caillebotte. Last year, the Getty Museum, the Musee D’Orsay and the Chicago Art Institute put on a great once-in-a-lifetime exhibition of Caillebotte’s work, entitled “Painting Men”. French art critics responded with rage, implying that the curators were attempting to contort the narrative around Caillebotte to suit some political agenda. I’m sorry Messrs, but the work speaks for itself! We know that Caillebotte lived with a woman for the last eleven years of his life, and left his estates to her. It was obviously an important relationship to him. We also know that his figure paintings almost exclusively feature fraternities of men- either competing in rowing or yachting, or relaxing in his salon with a newspaper, or as pedestrians on the newly constructed Parisian bridges and walkways, or, like here, working together doing manual labor. He was fascinated by images of camaraderie and brotherhood among men.
It’s interesting I think that in his day Caillebotte’s work was rejected from the Parisian Salons for depicting working class people, who were not considered a fit subject for serious art. And today his work inspires fierce debates over his representation of gender. It looks like every generation has to reinterpret Caillebotte for itself. I prefer not to evaluate Caillebotte through a Marxist lens, nor through queer theory, but to simply take him as a great artist and to focus on his formalistic achievements.
The Chicago Art Institute, hoping to avert controversy, simply retitled the exhibition “Caillebotte: Painting His World”, which is a fine title, if a little anodyne. They wanted to offer the widest possible field to interpret his work, even if some art lovers over here felt that it was a capitulation.
But never fear! We got to see the paintings and I found the show spectacular. Once again, I think Caillebotte’s work speaks for itself, as one of the most successful attempts to blend impressionism and realism. Only one thing struck me- that many of the paintings on display come from private collections. Some of these paintings had not been seen in decades, and now that the show is over, we may never see them again. What do I feel about private collectors?
On the one hand, by “collecting” them, these wealthy connoisseurs deprive the public of seeing great masterpieces. On the other hand, by keeping them out of sight, on the rare occasions when we do get to see them, we treasure these works of art much more. I like the idea of private property, so I do not begrudge the Warbucks and the Rothschilds their private museums. I would just ask them to be generous in lending them to major shows and to please bequeath them to public museums upon their death (the Chicago Art Institute is an especially worthy candidate).
—-
To switch gears entirely, I’ve been attending the wrestling tournaments at our local colleges, and I enjoy them immensely. Recently, our local D1 University hosted Penn State, the premier wrestling program in the country.
We got slaughtered. 51 to nothing.
We have a great 157 lb wrestler named Gunner, a sophomore, and he’s the most talented wrestler on the team. I saw him pin a guy last month from Maryland, using a particular hold called “The Peterson” which is strictly an academic pin. I’ve never seen it executed in real life. But Gunner turned his back to the Maryland guy and then reached behind and grabbed him blind with one arm and one leg and brought him down to the mat in a lightning flash. They were facing away from each other- back-to-back and Gunner pinned him! That’s the Peterson. You don’t see it outside of the practice room.
Alas, Gunner went up against Penn State’s PJ Duke in our most recent bout. PJ Duke, in middle school, defeated the best high school wrestler in the country. Mr. Duke is now on the senior world team- as an eighteen year old! He won bronze at the Under 23 World Championships. So Gunner was facing off against a freight train. I was happy Gunner did not get pinned immediately. It took all three rounds, if I remember correctly.
But for me the highlight was seeing Penn State’s Marcus Blaze. He’s a tall, skinny 133 lb wrestler. While in high school he beat the NCAA champion Matt Ramos. He’s insanely gifted. He has no showy muscles. In his case, it is all speed, all mechanics. When I even say his name “Marcus Blaze” I feel something intuitive and illumining, as if his very name connects to some inner aspiration-fire.
In the same way that runners are getting faster, so are wrestlers becoming more skilled and dynamic. In music also we see violinists and pianists achieving proficiency at younger ages.
I just got back from a two day wrestling tournament hosted by a local Christian college, on the D3 level- which is the level most small colleges compete at.
Towards the end of the first day, I saw a young man who was bleeding from a couple of gashes on his face. He was breathing heavily and looked exhausted. He was putting on his cross-trainers and I asked him if he was going back to the hotel to rest. He said, “No way- I finished all my matches, so now I’m going to go running and then wrestle with my teammates to make weight for tomorrow!” I told him he was mad and he thanked me.
Then I saw another wrestler in the hallway preparing for his last match of the day. He looked really tired and I asked him how he was feeling. He told me he was okay, but just okay. He wasn’t thrilled with the idea of wrestling again that day. I told him that life is a constant battle- we have to be divine warriors. I recited Guru’s translation of one of his own songs:
“You have given me eyes,
But You have not given me sight.
You have given me a heart,
But You have not given me love.
Around me is the hope of the false city.
In this life-game, whichever road I walk along,
In the twinkling of an eye, that road is closed.
I am the eternal warrior; I am the eternal war.”
(https://www.srichinmoylibrary.com/pgr-40)
He closed his eyes and said very seriously, “I needed to hear these words. God sent you to tell me this. I can do it, I can definitely do it!”
I am very grateful that I live in Chicago. I may get tired, but I never get bored.

